Fortnum and Masons action exposes true UK Uncut motivation

Today, much of London has been gridlocked by the TUC march.

It’s never a bad thing that people want to engage in our democracy by demonstrating (even where the motivation of many lies in self-interest) but this afternoon’s attack on Fortnum and Mason is quite revealing.

The ’secret target’ mooted during the day was unveiled as F&M’s flagship store on Piccadilly, and it was subsequently occupied by UK Uncut.

Why there? I’m an avid reader of Private Eye and they’ve never been mentioned in the tax avoidance debate. So, what about their owners? Fortunately this isn’t a great corporate conspiracy. It’s all on Wikipedia. Fortnum is owned by Wittington Investments Limited, which in turn is is 79.2% owned by the Garfield Weston Foundation, and 20.8% owned by members of the Weston family.

And what of the Garfield Weston Foundation? Well, it’s actually one of the UK’s largest grant-making trusts.

From it’s 2009 annual report:

“This year, the Trustees have supported 1518 appeals out of a total of 3513 applications, which is a slight increase over last year. While the annual income has remained at a similar level to last year (around £38.5 million) the total cash donations of £37.6 million are lower than last year £41.1 million. This, however, is a reflection of the need for the Trustees’ to be prudent in order to bring their reserves up to a more conservative level following the substantial commitment to Oxford University of £25 million last year towards the development of the Bodleian Library. The figure of £37.6 million includes the second tranche of
£10 million of this grant and the Trustees are committed to pay the final £5 million next year. The Trustees have also been mindful of the possibility of requests for urgent funding being made by charities which have had their funding from other sources cut due to the difficult economic conditions and wished to maintain some temporary reserves to cover such eventuality.”

Additionally, F&M’s managing director, Beverly Aspinall, joined from that other great corporate evil, (sarcasm, by the way) the John Lewis Partnership, where she’d been for 24 years.

So, the demonstrators chose to attack a company with a female MD that has just funded one of Britain’s top libraries, that donated £37.6m to good causes in 2009 alone, and is building up reserves to help charities hit by the spending cuts.

Many have suggested the motives of many in the current protests is nothing to do with politics and everything to do with prejudice. Today, we saw conclusive proof.

UPDATE: UK Uncut have issued a press release, on the occupation. It’s quite remarkable. Here’s the link to the action:

F&M is owned by Whittington Investments. Whittington also owns a 54% share of Associated British Foods. They allege ABF have dodged over £40 million in tax.

So - hang on - Fortnum and Mason hasn’t actually done anything wrong? Nor has its parent company. ABF has. And the only link is that the two companies have mutual shareholders. But they’re occupying F&M. Indeed, the headline reads “UK Uncut occupy tax dodgers Fortnum and Mason.” - then goes on to describe how they are not.

One ABF owned business is Primark. So, why not occupy Primark? Thankfully, the release includes a quote from Sally Mason, a Uk Uncut supporter from Manchester who is currently occupying Fortnum & Mason. Her quote is quite illuminating, for it includes the line: “Fortnum & Mason is a symbol of wealth and greed. It is where the Royal Family and the super-rich do their weekly shop.”

Yes, they do make expensive things. Including a ‘Royal blend’ tea. Then again, prices of that start at £1.50 - hardly super rich territory.

Posted: March 26th, 2011
Categories: Campaign Issues, Economy, Spending Cuts
Tags: , ,
Comments: 15 Comments.
Comments
Comment from Andrew Allison - March 26, 2011 at 7:08 pm

Well said. Show’s them up for what they are; mindless bigots.

Comment from Andre Vincent - March 26, 2011 at 7:16 pm

Well it’s been said many times “All proper tea is theft”

Comment from V - March 26, 2011 at 7:46 pm

Its the symbolism …..sheesh

Comment from corby lad - March 26, 2011 at 7:48 pm

Idiots. Having attended school at Brooke Weston ctc school, which Mr Weston built and bankrolled in one of the poorest UK towns I have first hand experience of the good the late Mr Weston and his family do

Comment from Steve Foley - March 26, 2011 at 8:12 pm

I used to work for ABF (Sunblest) many years ago and the charitable donations of the Weston Family were well known. It goes to show that UK Uncut is just another “Agitprop” Organisation.

Comment from Nick - March 26, 2011 at 8:32 pm

I fail to see how occupying a tea & cake shop constitutes protesting against budgetary cuts.

Comment from Lee - March 26, 2011 at 8:43 pm

The group that owned 79.2% Gave 1 million to the tories in ‘charity’ donations over years gone by. Plus the owner avoids huge tax. It’s clear why they did it. Theres no secret motivation why would there be?

Comment from Owen Williams - March 26, 2011 at 9:43 pm

UK Uncut may have got it wrong this time. If the owners of F&M are good they won’t mind if UK Uncut spoil a day’s shopping. Headlines are shorter than Tweets and rarely convey anything useful. I hope they didn’t damage the property. UK Uncut stories that I’m aware of, when they occupy, involved taking over a space for the purpose of being a library or a school. Capitalism isn’t doing it’s job. Business is supposed to give back, feed others to feed itself. The owners of F&M may have this right but in general (mode) big business have it wrong. I hope the owners of those businesses were inconvenienced by today.

Comment from Matthew - March 26, 2011 at 10:31 pm

That’s very funny Andre, I think proudhon himself would even chuckle.

UK uncut dont occupy primark because these hypocrites are happy to buy their phony militant revolutionary costumes there, they buy cheap khakis and boots because they know next season’s protest vogue will be the cynical city worker look.

Pingback from Quote of the day: Metropolitan Police. | Boris Backer. - March 26, 2011 at 11:56 pm

[...] after the anti-cuts brigade occupied the store in apparent objection to how most of its profits are given to charity.) Read more from Quotes Fortnum and Mason, Metropolitan Police Click here to [...]

Comment from Justiceandpeace - March 27, 2011 at 12:23 am

I think Nick is leaping ahead of himself here. I have been doing some checking up on this foundation, and yes they do seem to give away lots of money, which is great, well done! Then we find reference to …

Unigestion (Guernsey) Limited, PO Box 255
Trafalgar Court, Les Banques, St. Peter Port
Guernsey, GY1 3QL

Erm… a charity that channels funds through the the secrecy of a tax haven!? Why would they do that? There is also reference to Bermuda? Another tax haven. Maybe this all checks out just fine and we will all be happy with the charities activities, in which case maybe UKUncut have scored an own goal. But Nick, lets just wait and see what checks out, as I’m not sure we know the whole story as yet…

Comment from Nick Taylor - March 27, 2011 at 9:54 am

Philanthropy is symptomatic of a broken system, not some “great good” - we covered that one back in the early 20th Century. Been there, done that.

We don’t need philanthropy, we need corporations (and the subsidiaries of corporations) to pay their taxes. Whittington are the beneficiaries of tax-dodging. All of their companies are fair game.

Comment from simon bayley - March 27, 2011 at 3:17 pm

You fail to mention “The Charity Commission has found that some of the family members who run the Garfield Weston Foundation allowed an investment company it controlled to make political donations between 1993 and 2007″ to the Conservative Party

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/consumer_goods/article7094924.ece

Comment from Anonymous - March 27, 2011 at 7:00 pm

Fortnums profit 100k
Primark £344mn

Pingback from Twitted by MrStevenMoore - September 1, 2011 at 6:29 pm

[...] This post was Twitted by MrStevenMoore [...]